Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Dolores Press, Inc., et al v. Michael Evans, et al
as 21-55480
Defendant / Appellee:
DOC'S DREAM, LLC, TINA PEREIDA, MICHAEL EVANS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELISSA SCOTT and DOLORES PRESS, INC., a California corporation
Michael Evans v. The Kroger Co., et al
as 20-6151
Defendant / Appellee:
ANN REED, President; The Kroger Co. Inc, AMANDA HOOD, Executive; UFCW Local Union #227, THE KROGER CO. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EVANS
Shaoming Song v. Alex Azar
as 20-1554
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL EVANS, Deputy Director of National Institute on Aging, MICHAEL BERNIER, Staff Scientist and ALEX AZAR
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAOMING SONG
Woodson v. Board of Directors of the Harbor Hill Condominium Homeowners Association et al
as 3:2020cv03135
Defendant:
Betty T. Yee, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Board of Directors of the Harbor Hill Condominium Homeowners Association and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Evans Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Johnson (Murray)
as 19-3952
Defendant:
David Cherry, AKA Showtime, Michael Evans, AKA Puff, Eric Grayson, AKA Gistol and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Donnell Murray, AKA Don P.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Slusher v. Asset Consulting Experts, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01265
Defendant:
Michael Evans and Asset Consulting Experts, LLC
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Slusher
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McCoy et al v. Simon et al
as 4:2017cv11872
Plaintiff:
Jerry McCoy and Jerco Investments Incorporated
Defendant:
Sam Simon , Michael Evans , William Fenton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re: Michael Keeling
as 17-1976
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
