Cases 11 - 20 of 37,517
Hall v. Rosenberg, et al.
as 24-3580
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge ALICIA G. ROSENBERG, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE, Attorney CAREE HARPER, ATTORNEY, Civil Rights Attorney and others
Carl Puckett, Jr., et al v. Ain Jeem, Inc., et al
as 24-5537
Plaintiff:
CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR. and MARCELLA PUCKETT
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Baus v. Fluent, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Steve Baus
Defendant:
Fluent, Inc. and Fluent, LLC d/b/a SaveToday
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
P.C. v. D FORT HOTEL, LLC.
as 1:2024cv01584
Plaintiff:
P.C.
Defendant:
D FORT HOTEL, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Mr & Mrs Larry E Clark and L & M Hair Care Products Inc
Defendant:
Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J Donahue, Sr, Charles McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Richmond v. Office of Child Support Enforcement et al
as 4:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Corey D Richmond
Defendant:
Office of Child Support Enforcement and Brandy L Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Brian Swanson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-11846
Petitioner:
BRIAN D. SWANSON
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Ashour v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Ashour
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, New Orleans Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
