Cases 21 - 30 of 606
Demarest v. Town of Underhill
as 24-147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID P. DEMAREST
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF UNDERHILL, a municipality and charter town, DANIEL STEINABAUER, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, BOB STONE, as an individual and in official capacity and others
United States of America v. Antone
as 24-118
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAKOTA ANTONE
Ewing v. Camus et al
as 3:2023cv02154
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Pablo Garces Camus and Dboss Funding, LLC
Ewing v. Gitre et al
as 3:2023cv02250
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Christopher Gitre and Relief Consultants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Ewing v. Isaac et al
as 3:2023cv02127
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Isaam Isaac and Fun in the Sun Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
CALLERY et al v. DELOS CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04784
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CALLERY and TINA FASANO
Defendant:
DELOS CAPITAL, LLC, SHOREVEST CAPITAL, LLC, STEVE ZAMBITO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mario LeeIn re: Mario Lee
as 23-14033
Petitioner:
In re: MARIO ANTON LEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Purisima v. Babcock et al
as 1:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
Anton C. Purisima, Four Son's of Anton C. Purisima, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Morgan Babcock, City of New York, New York State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
