Cases 21 - 30 of 478
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Perez-Quinilla, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1919
Petitioner:
LUIS YAERSINIO PEREZ-QUINILLA, LUIS DANIEL PEREZ-CUEVAS, LILI LUCRESIA CUEVAS-RODRIGUEZ DE PEREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Everett Spillard v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70061
Not Classified By Court:
In re: EVERETT SPILLARD and CUEVA, Warden
Petitioner:
EVERETT SPILLARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Pham et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01744
Plaintiff:
John Pham, Diana Lazarte, Marco Cuevas and others
Defendant:
RealPage Inc, Avenue5 Residential LLC, BH Management Services LLC and others
Interested Party:
Gabriel Navarro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Pham et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as WAW/2:22-CV-01744
Plaintiff:
Pham, John Pham, Diana Lazarte and others
Defendant:
RealPage Inc, Avenue5 Residential LLC, BH Management Services LLC and others
Interested Party:
Gabriel Navarro
USA v. Cuevas
as 23-50240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rolando Cuevas
USA v. Carlos Cuevas-Almonte
as 23-1300
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS ALBERTO CUEVAS-ALMONTE
Gutierrez-Cuevas v. Garland
as 22-1988
Petitioner:
ANGEL EMILIO GUTIERREZ-CUEVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Rickey Louis Alford v. Karen Bass et al
as 2:2022cv09024
Plaintiff:
Rickey Louis Alford and Morris Day
Defendant:
Karen Bass, Gavin Newson, Lola Smallwood Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
