Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
State of Arizona, et al v. Ashton Company Incorporated Co, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15691
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee: CITY OF TUCSON
Intervenor - Appellant: RAYTHEON COMPANY and PIMA COUNTY
Defendant - Appellee: ASHTON COMPANY INCORPORATED CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS, BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY, DON MACKEY OLDSMOBILE CADILLAC, INC. and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, TOMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
In re: Webvention LLC ('294) Patent Litigation
as 1:2011md02294
Plaintiff: Novartis Corporation, Furniture Brands International, Inc., HDM Furniture Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant: Webvention Holdings LLC , Webvention , Adidas America Inc. and others
Counter_claimant: Landstar System, Inc. et al , Landstar System Holdings, Inc. , Landstar System, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant: Webvention LLC , 20-20 Icovia Inc., Marie Claire/Hearst and others
Arizona, State of v. Ashton Company Incorporated Contractors and Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00634
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of
Defendant: Ashton Company Incorporated Contractors and Engineers, Baldor Electric Company, Don Mackey Oldsmobile - Cadillac Incorporated and others
Intervenor_plaintiff: Tucson, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Joseph et al v. Fluor Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00380
Plaintiff: Jean Joseph, Vernadine Mabry and Bernard Mabry, III
Defendant: Fluor Corporation, Fleetwood Enterprises Inc, MMR Constructors, Inc. and others
Movant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Joseph et al v. Fluor Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00379
Plaintiff: Jean Joseph, Vernadine Mabry and Bernard Mabry, III
Defendant: Fluor Corporation, Fleetwood Enterprises Inc, MMR Constructors, Inc. and others
Movant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Joseph et al v. Fluor Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00174
Plaintiff: Jean Joseph, Vernadine Mabry and Bernard Mabry, III
Defendant: Fluor Corporation, Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. and Maytag Corporation
Movant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Fluor Corporation v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company et al
as 1:2007mc10159
Plaintiff: Fluor Corporation, Fluor Corporation, Fluor Corporation and others
Defendant: American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
ThirdParty Defendant: Pinnacle Insurance Co.,Inc., Pinnacle Insurance Co.,Inc., Pinnacle Insurance Co.,Inc. and others
Fluor Corporation v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
as 1:2007mc00125
Plaintiff: Fluor Corporation
Defendant: American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company and American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
Fluor Corporation v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
as 4:2007mc80083
Plaintiff: Fluor Corporation, Fluor Corporation, Fluor Corporation and others
Defendant: American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company and American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
Fluor Corporation v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
as 2:2007mc00042
Plaintiff: Fluor Corporation, Fluor Corporation, Fluor Corporation and others
Defendant: American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
Nominal Defendant: Metso Minerals Industries Inc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?