Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Logan County Commission v. Cardinal Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02296
Plaintiff:
Logan County Commission
Defendant:
Cardinal Health, Inc. , McKesson Corporation , AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
In Re: Modafinil AntiTrust, et al, et al
as 15-3475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
J M SMITH CORP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company, MEIJER INC, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CEPHALON INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES INC, RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings,, et al v. Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
as 15-1290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC., JUDITH CARRASQUILLO, on her behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., a/k/a SAJ Distributors and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.
Movant:
CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH, JIMMY JAMES THULE and others
Interested Party:
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Effexor XR Antitrust
as 15-1274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROFESSIONAL DRUG CO, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OP, STEPHEN L LAFRANCE HOLDINGS INC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WYETH INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Astellas Pharma US, Inc. v. Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings,, et al
as 14-8023
Petitioner:
ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.
Respondent:
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., a/k/a SAJ Distributors, STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC., a/k/a SAJ Distributors, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Movant:
CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH, JIMMY JAMES THULE and others
Interested Party:
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
In Re: Hypodermic Product
as 13-2378
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMERICAN SALES CO INC, SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEDSTAR HEALTH INC and MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC
Defendant - Appellee:
BECTON DICKINSON CO
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC.
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant:
WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re:
EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party:
IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner:
TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff:
George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant:
Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re:
Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al v. SANDOZ, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv01866
Petitioner:
SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC., STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., MEIJER, INC. and others
Respondent:
SANDOZ, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SAJ Distributors, Inc. et al v. Eisai Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv02345
Plaintiff:
SAJ Distributors, Inc., SAJ Distributors, Inc., SAJ Distributors, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Eisai Co., Ltd. and Eisai Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
