Cases 31 - 40 of 1,965
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pat v. Tribune Publishing Company, LLC
as 1:2023cv06310
Plaintiff:
Arnold Pat and Pat Arnold
Defendant:
Tribune Publishing Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Robert A. Chapek et al
as 1:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Stourbridge Investments LLC
Defendant:
Robert A. Chapek, Christine M. McCarthy, Kareem Daniel and others
Nominal Defendant:
The Walt Disney Company
Foley v. Union De Banques Arabes Et Francaises
as 23-1186
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Virginia Foley, Estate of Laurence Michael Foley, Sr., by and through its Administrator Virginia Foley, Megan Foley and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Union De Banques Arabes Et Francaises
In re: Arnold Clayton
as 23-12588
Petitioner:
In re: ARNOLD CLAYTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hugues Gervat v. Robert Chapek et al
as 2:2023cv06389
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Robert Chapek, Christine M. McCarthy, Kareem Daniel and others
BT BRANDS, INC. et al v. NOBLE ROMAN'S INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01352
Plaintiff:
BT Brands, Inc. and Gary Copperud
Defendant:
NOBLE ROMAN'S INC., A. Scott Mobley, Paul W. Mobley and others
Arnold v. McDonough
as 23-2210
Claimant:
SHAWN A. ARNOLD
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Direct Components, Inc. v. Microchip USA, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv01617
Plaintiff:
Direct Components, Inc.
Defendant:
Microchip USA, LLC, Trevor Toma, Jeff Ruby and others
Arnold's Office Furniture, LLC, et al v. Ian Borden, et al
as 23-2235
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARNOLDS OFFICE FURNITURE LLC, f/k/a Arnold's Used Office Furniture, LLC and SUNLINE USA LLC, d/b/a Sunline Supply
Defendant / Appellant:
IAN BORDEN and I M BORDEN GROUP LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
