Cases 31 - 40 of 571
Wayne Johnson for Congress, Inc., et al v. Fox News, et al
as 23-10460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS, INC. and WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FOX NEWS, BRIAN M. KILMEADE and JEREMY C. HUNT
Major Mike Webb v. Capital Investment Advisors, LLC
as 23-1003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE WEBB, d/b/a Friends for Mike Webb, d/b/a Major Mike Webb for Congress, d/b/a Angels of Liberty, d/b/a Major Mike Webb for VA
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPITAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Callier v. Tina Forte for Congress
as 3:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Tina Forte for Congress
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Webb v. Capital Investment Advisors, LLC.
as 1:2022cv01271
Petitioner:
Major Mike Webb D/B/A FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB (C00591537), D/B/A MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS (H8VA08167), D/B/A ANGELS OF LIBERTY, D/B/A MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR VA and Major Mike Webb doing business as Friends for Mike Webb (C00591537) doing business as Major Mike Webb for Congress (H8VA08167) doing business as Angels of Liberty doing business as Major Mike Webb for VA
Respondent:
Capital Investment Advisors, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mike Webb v. Department of the Army, et al
as 22-5292
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mike Webb, Major, doing business as Friends for Mike Webb, also known as Major Mike Webb for Congress
Respondent / Appellee:
Department of the Army, Defense Intelligence Agency, Merit Systems Protection Board and others
Rojas v. Nancy Pelosi for Congress et al
as 1:2022cv05868
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi for Congress, Nancy Pelosi and Actblue LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc. and East Texas Air One
Consolidated Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WAYNE JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS INC et al v. HUNT et al
as 4:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
WAYNE JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS INC and WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
JEREMY C HUNT doing business as JEREMY FOR GEORGIA, FOX NEWS NETWORK LLC and BRIAN M KILMEADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
WEBB v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2022cv02034
Plaintiff:
MIKE WEBB doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB (C00591537) doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS (H8VA08167) doing business as ANGELS OF LIBERTY and MIKE WEBB Major doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB (C00591537) doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS (H8VA08167) doing business as ANGELS OF LIBERTY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION and FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
