Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Engel v. Best et al
as 3:2017cv05082
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Karen Best, Mike Booth, Bob Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Synalloy Corporation et al v. Phoenix Chemical Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Synalloy Corporation , Manufacturers Chemicals, LLC and CRI Tolling, LLC
Defendant:
Phoenix Chemical Company, Inc. , John Bryant and Wilford Douglas Bonds
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Nicolas et al v. Audi AG et al
as 3:2017cv02406
Plaintiff:
Melissa Nicolas , Denard White , Jorge Gomez and others
Defendant:
Audi of America LLC and Audi AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
CRI-Leslie, LLC, v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
as 16-17424
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRI-LESLIE, LLC, DONALD W. WALLACE, TAX MATTERS PARTNER
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Cris Canales-Reyes v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-2160
Petitioner:
CRIS FABIOLA CANALES-REYES
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Darreyll Thomas v. William Griesbach
as 16-3228
Petitioner:
DARREYLL T. THOMAS
Respondent:
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH
Party-in-Interest:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LARSEN, KELLY SALINAS, ROBERT HUMPHREYS, Warden and others
Murillo et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as TXN/3:16-cv-00955
Plaintiff:
Martha Murillo , Kathleen Bates , Jamie Anzaldua and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
USA v. Cristobal Velasquez, et al
as 15-51164
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CRISTOBAL VELASQUEZ, also known as Little Cris
Ruiz v. Comenity Bank et al
as 2:2015cv02487
Plaintiff:
Mary Cris V Ruiz
Defendant:
Comenity Bank and Experian Information Solutions Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ruiz v. Comenity Bank et al
as 2:2015cv02486
Plaintiff:
Mary Cris V Ruiz
Defendant:
Comenity Bank and Experian Information Solutions Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
