Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Abdo et al v. Fitzsimmons et al
as 3:2017cv00851
Plaintiff:
John E. Abdo
Defendant:
Michael Fitzsimmons, Peter Lai, Christopher G. Power and others
Miscellaneou:
Rising Tide I, LLC and Rising Tide II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00520
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: Raleigh Wake Citizen
as 16-1898
Petitioner:
In re: RALEIGH WAKE CITIZENS ASSOCIATION, JANNET B. BARNES, BEVERLEY S. CLARK and others
:
Harris v. Morris et al
as 2:2016cv11162
Plaintiff:
John Isaac Harris
Defendant:
Mike Morris , Mary Treder , Dennis M. Beagen and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Patricia Ann Fitzsimmons
as 5:2015cv00672
Defendant:
Patricia Ann Fitzsimmons
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Fitzsimmons v. Wagner et al
as 3:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Erin Maureen Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
John C Wagner and Aljazeera America
Cause Of Action: Electronic Communications Privacy Act
Fitzsimmons v. USA, et al
as 3:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Erin Maureen Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
United States of America and United Arab Emirates
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Healthcare Essentials, Inc. v. Fitzsimmons Surgical Supply, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01988
Plaintiff:
Healthcare Essentials, Inc.
Defendant:
Fitzsimmons Surgical Supply, Inc. and Bonnie Williams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Fitzsimmons v. US Federal Government et al
as 3:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Erin Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
US Federal Government, State of Iowa, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. States, et al
as 13-606
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
MICHELLE STATES, PATRICIA ORDINO, KIM DARNALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
