Cases 31 - 40 of 11,963
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
In Re: Biologic therapies, Inc.
as 2:2024mc00059
Debtor:
Bilogic Therapies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gordon P. Jones
Defendant:
Luke Whalen
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
Agness McCurry, et alIn re: Agness McCurry, et al
as 24-5405
Petitioner:
In re: AGNESS MCCURRY and ETHA JONES
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
JONES et al v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01703
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, SILVERSCRIPT INSURANCE COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DENISE ELAYNE JONES and MARILYN A. MANZI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Arthur Jones
as 24-1351
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Human v. International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO) et al
as 4:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO), International Union of Police Associations doing business as National Police and Troopers Association and Jone Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
