Cases 31 - 40 of 697
Stark v. Hill
as 3:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
Collette Stark
Defendant:
Greg Hill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, et al v. , et alIn re: Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, et al v. , et al
as 23-1687
Petitioner:
In re: BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA, PDV HOLDING INC and CITGO PETROLEUM CORP
Intervenor:
PETROLEOS DE VENEZUELA SA
Respondent:
CRYSTALLEX INTERNATIONAL CORP, PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO VENEZUELA LTD, CONOCOPHILLIPS PETROZUATA BV and others
United States v. Stark
as 23-4013
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT SAMUEL STARK
Lippman v. Ford et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Ilene Lippman
Defendant:
Robert B Ford, Robert J. Alpern, Sally E. Blount and others
STARK v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRA STARK
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION and CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Joseph Malriat, et al v. QuantumScape Corporation, et al
as 23-80000
Respondent:
JOSEPH MALRIAT, FRANK FISH, KATHY STARK and others
Petitioner:
QUANTUMSCAPE CORPORATION, JAGDEEP SINGH, KEVIN HETTRICH and others
Stark v. Pandawhite, Inc
as 3:2022cv01775
Plaintiff:
Collete Stark
Defendant:
Pandawhite, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Lamm et al v. Hall et al
as 5:2022cv01961
Plaintiff:
Megan K. Lamm and Haley M. Lamm
Defendant:
Judge Rosemarie A. Hall, Guardian ad Litem Nikki L. Reed, Attorney Susan J. Lax and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States v. Conrad Starks
as 22-2925
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Conrad Starks
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
