Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Aaron et al v. Hamilton County Clerk's Office et al
as 1:2018cv00699
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson, Richard Elliott, Adrian Lilly and others
Defendant:
Hamilton County Clerk's Office, Hon. Mark Schweikert, Aftab Pureval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coates v. Valeo Financial Advisors LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00574
Defendant:
Pamela K Koehler, Judge Nancy H Vaidik, Judge Edward W Najam, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Coates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Partridge et al v. Equifax et al
as UT/2:17-cv-01017
Plaintiff:
Tom Partridge , Zane L. Christensen , Jennifer J. Christensen and others
Defendant:
Equifax and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Ballariano et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as TXW/1:17-cv-00790
Plaintiff:
Dino Ballariano , Juan Bautista , Jo-Anne Beverage and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft
Jones et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MOE/4:16-cv-01943
Plaintiff:
Annie Jones , Lisa Alfonso , Jeanne Amadon and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR v. KOEHLER
as 2:2016mc00321
Petitioner:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Respondent:
CYNTHA R KOEHLER
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Romain et al v. Seabrook et al
as 1:2016cv08470
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Romain , Herman Jiminian , Jeanette Feliciano and others
Defendant:
Norman Seabrook, Elias Husamudeen , Joseph Bracco and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Koehler v. Kirkorsky
as 4:2016cv01432
Plaintiff:
Colleen Koehler
Defendant:
Mark Kirkorsky
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fadel Hamdan v. Charles Koehler
as 16-1067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FADEL HAMDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES F. KOEHLER, IV
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
