Cases 41 - 50 of 59
In re: EVOQ Properties, Inc. v. n
as 13-56546
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MERUELO MADDUX PROPERTIES, INC.
Appellant:
JOHN CHARLES MADDUX, JOHN CHARLES MADDUX TURST, U/DT dated July 24, 2006 and SUNSTONE BELLA VISTA, LLC
Appellee:
CHARLESTOWN CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, HARTLAND ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and MERUELO MADDUX PROPERTIES, INC.
In re: Meruelo Maddux Properties, Inc
as 13-56545
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MERUELO MADDUX PROPERTIES, INC.
Appellant:
JOHN CHARLES MADDUX, JOHN CHARLES MADDUX TURST, U/DT dated July 24, 2006 and SUNSTONE BELLA VISTA, LLC
Objector:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA
Appellee:
CHARLESTOWN CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, HARTLAND ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF EQUITY HOLDERS and others
In re: John Charles Kenney
as 12-2537
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN CHARLES KENNEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Volungu
as 12-1394
Petitioner - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Respondent - Appellant:
JOHN CHARLES VOLUNGUS
United States v. Fletcher
as 11-6277
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CHARLES FLETCHER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
US v. John Wellman
as 10-4689
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CHARLES WELLMAN
Bean et al v. Rowe et al
as 4:2010mc00003
Plaintiff:
Francis R Bean, Penny S Bean, James C Chiles and others
Defendant:
David Rowe, Windermere Holdings, Iguana Enterprises, Inc and others
United States v. Fletcher
as 10-6028
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CHARLES FLETCHER
John-Charles v. Abanico et al
as 4:2007cv05786
Plaintiff:
Curtis M. John-Charles
Defendant:
E. Abanico, L. Rayasa, Ben Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
