Cases 41 - 50 of 832
Shelton v. Comerica Bank et al
as 3:2023cv02815
Plaintiff:
Joan Shelton
Defendant:
Comerica Bank, Conduent Business Services, LLC and Comerica Bank national banking association, d/b/a DIRECT EXPRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Shelton Benoite
as 23-12467
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHELTON JOHN BENOITE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Oliver v. Michaud et al
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oliver and Clyde Shelton
Defendant:
Joseph Leonard Michaud, Mary Susan McElroy, John James McConnell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bella Health and Wellness et al v. Weiser et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
BELLA HEALTH AND WELLNESS, DENISE "DEDE" CHISM, ABBY SINNETT and others
Defendant:
PHIL WEISER, ROLAND FLORES, AMANDA MIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHELTON v. TITAN FUNDING PARTNERS LLC
as 2:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant:
TITAN FUNDING PARTNERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
SHAGHAGHI et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
HELDA SHAGHAGHI, JAMES SHELTON, MELISSA SHELTON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SHELTON v. NANDYPROTECTINGFAMILIES LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01698
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant:
NANDYPROTECTINGFAMILIES LLC and ETHOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
