Cases 51 - 60 of 5,311
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sanchez v. Garland et al
as 4:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Bianca M Sanchez
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Marker v. New Mexico House of Representatives et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Larry Marker
Respondent:
New Mexico House of Representatives, Eliseo Alcon, Anthony Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Mavachev et al v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv20417
Plaintiff:
Eric Mavachev and Jennifer Shafir
Defendant:
Xandi Garcia, Maybel Sanchez, Mirta Lora and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 685 Backyard LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
685 Backyard LLC d/b/a 685 Backyard and Maria Sara Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
USA v. Villasenor-Sanchez
as 24-50227
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edgar Orlando Villasenor-Sanchez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
