Cases 61 - 70 of 2,270
Simon, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3997
Petitioner:
ANNOVE SIMON, NATALIE JEAN and SOFIA SIMON-JEAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Balderas
as 23-40691
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Simon Ricarte Balderas, Jr., also known as B. J.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Invectys Inc. et al v. NKILT Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04436
Plaintiff:
Invectys Inc., Invectys USA Inc. and Invectys, SAS
Defendant:
NKILT Therapeutics, Inc., SWH Consulting, SASU and Simon Wain-Hobson
Wrenn v. Kennedy
as 3:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
Simone Wrenn
Defendant:
Marsha Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nunez v. Fraser
as 23-7763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAVIER NUNEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NICOLE FRASER, MARK SILBER, ELI SILBER and others
Defendant:
OLIVIA GIEGERICH, MARK SIMON and PACHECO, Police Officer for City of New York/Detective Squad
Morlans et al v. Southwest Oregon Farms, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
Roberto Morlans, Francisco Acuna, Marti Ars and others
Defendant:
Southwest Oregon Farms, LLC, Takilma Road Operator, LLC, Takilma Road Processor, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Yorktallman v. Trustee, et alia, of Tamara Renee Yorktallman et al
as 0:2023cv03303
Plaintiff:
Tamara Renee Yorktallman
Defendant:
Trustee, et alia, of Tamara Renee Yorktallman, State of Minnesota, The, Molly Mulcahy Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Elizabeth Simon-Domingo, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3842
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH GRISELDA SIMON-DOMINGO and BETZAYDA ELIZABETH PEDRO-SIMON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
US v. Deric Simons
as 23-4637
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DERIC BREON SIMONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
