Cases 61 - 70 of 2,870
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff:
Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent:
State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party:
Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of Rhode Island v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Defendant:
Shell Petroleum, Inc., Valero Refining-Texas, L.P., CITGO Refining and Chemicals Company L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
The AASI Beneficiaries Trust, by and through Kenneth A. Welt, Liquidating Trustee v. AVX Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv03472
Defendant:
Hitachi Chemical Co. Ltd., Nichicon Corporation, Shinyei Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Counter Defendant:
THE AASI BENEFICIARIES TRUST, BY AND THROUGH KENNETH A. WELT, LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Benchmark Electronics Incorporated et al v. AVX Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv07047
Plaintiff:
Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated, Benchmark Electronics Manufacturing Solutions Incorporated, Benchmark Electronics Manufacturing Solutions (Moorpark) Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Shizuki Electric Company Limited, Fujitsu Limited, Nichicon Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Divelbiss v. Citibank N A et al
as 5:2023cv01343
Plaintiff:
Dustin Cheree Divelbiss
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Citibank N A and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Silas v. City of New York
as 23-7227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REYNOLD B. SILAS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF YONKERS, CITY OF YONKERS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Detective CAVE, of The City of Yonkers Police Department (Shield # unknown) and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN DOE, shield # unknown, individually and in his official capacity
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu et al
as 3:2023cv04620
Defendant:
Thiruvenkatasamy, Senthilrajan, Pradeep Puli Rukmangatha Sairam Babu and others
Plaintiff:
Nagarajan Duraisamy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ATR PAPER INC. v. BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC. et al
as 2:2023cv12696
Plaintiff:
ATR PAPER INC.
Defendant:
BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC. doing business as BAZIC PRODUCTS, RICHMOND VAN and DOES 1-5
Counter Claimant:
BANGKIT (U.S.A.), INC.
Counter Defendant:
ARELIS TORRES ROSADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
7-Eleven, Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05746
Petitioner:
The Gymboree Corporation, The Children's Place Retail Stores, Inc., Thornton's Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marathon Petroleum Company LP, Priceline.com, LLC, National RailRoad Passenger Corporation and others
Respondent:
Mastercard Incorporated, Wells Fargo & Company, Citigroup Inc and others
Interested Party:
Cardtronics USA, Inc. and John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)
Material Witne:
Verifone, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Transform SR Holdings LLC and Elgin Ave. Recovery, LLC
Defendant:
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)
Special Master:
James Orenstein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Harrell v. Aquion, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Harrell
Defendant:
Aquion, Inc. doing business as RainSoft, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and A & B Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
