Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Jackson v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2010cv00938
Plaintiff:
Mark Jackson
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company, Rohm and Haas Company, Rohm and Haas Company Benefits Administrative Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Terry Miller
as 09-50981
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRY MICHAEL MILLER
Lewis, et al v. Miller, et al
as 2:2000cv01796
Plaintiff:
Neil Lewis and Sharon Lewis
Defendant:
Norman Michael Miller , Sheri Miller , Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Lange v. City of Grand Junction, Colorado
as 2:2009ms00080
Plaintiff:
James N. Lange, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Grand Junction, Colorado, Stan Hilkey, Glen Coyne and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Miller v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
as 5:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Miller
Defendant:
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GREEN EDGE V RUBBER MULCH
as 09-1455
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant:
Green Edge Enterprises, LLC
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
International Mulch Company and Michael Miller
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Cross Appellant:
Rubber Mulch ETC., LLC and Rubber Resources, LTD., LLP
Miller v. Automated Accounts Inc
as 2:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Miller
Defendant:
Automated Accounts Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
