Cases 81 - 90 of 178
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO., KROGER COMPANY, SAFEWAY INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 345 HEALTH CARE FUND, WALGREEN CO., KROGER COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE and others
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 14-1522
Defendant / Appellant:
RANBAXY INC., RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SUPERVALU, INC., MEIJER, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
JONATHAN RICH, EDWARD BREIVIK, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, US PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATION FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Heidel v. Coopervision, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00831
Plaintiff:
Amanda Heidel
Defendant:
CooperVision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Bausch + Lomb Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
United States of America v. American Express Company
as 15-1672
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Maryland, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Mastercard International Incorporated and Visa Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Joseph Gregory Sidak, Esq., Robert D Willig, David J Teece and others
Movant:
Home Depot USA, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., Academy, Ltd., DBA Academy Sports + Outdoors and others
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc, et al v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited, et al
as 15-2236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OP, MEIJER INC, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT US LLC and others
Meijer, Inc. et al v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11828
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Inc., Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc., Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Larsen-Ball v. Cooper Vision, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Marn Larsen-Ball
Defendant:
Cooper Vision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc. , Bausch + Lomb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In re: Effexor XR Antitrust
as 15-1187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEIJER INC and MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC
Defendant - Appellee:
WYETH INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC and TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD
In Re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit, et al
as 14-4205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEIJER INC and MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER INC, PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER LAMBERT CO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
