Cases 1 - 10 of 21,034
ALIEV et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01495
Plaintiff:
MURAT MAGOMEDOVICH ALIEV, BONUM CAPITAL (CYPRUS) LTD, LIMTED LIABILITY COMPANY BONUM CAPITAL and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant:
Agilon Health, Inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
SMITH-GORDON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00779
Petitioner:
BRITTANY SMITH-GORDON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Smith v. Knowlton
as 24-3208
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant:
D. KNOWLTON, California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Salazar et al v. United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative et al
as 0:2024cv01847
Defendant:
United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative, United Sugars Corporation, American Sugar Refining, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Salazar, Liana Britt, Kimberly Rybarczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
John A. Mansour v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 4:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
John A. Mansour
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HTET v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Theint Win Htet
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JANET YELLEN, BRADLEY T. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
