Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Emhart Industries, Inc. v. New England Container Company, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2006cv00218
Plaintiff: Emhart Industries, Inc
Counter Claimant: New England Container Company, Inc, Black & Decker Inc., Organic Dyestuffs Corp. and others
Defendant: Providence Washington Insurance Company, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, United States Department of the Navy and others
Counter Defendant: United States Department of the Air Force
Cross Claimant: The United States of America and Black & Decker, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Induplate Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Univar USA, Inc. and others
4Th Party Plaintiff: BASF Corp.
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Black & Decker Inc
4Th Party Defendant: ConocoPhillips Company and Rohm and Haas Company
Cross Defendant: BNS, LLC
Not Classified By Court: Original Bradford Soap Works, Inc. n/k/a Bradford Soap International, Inc, Eastern Color & Chemical Co, Teknor-Apex and others
Petitioner: Rhodes Technologies, Inc., The Dow Chemical Company and Win Noren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Applebaum v. Allan et al
as 3:2023cv01234
Plaintiff: Scott A Applebaum
Defendant: Donald Allan, Jr., James M Loree, Andrea J Ayers and others
Nominal Defendant: Stanley Black & Decker Inc
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALDEN LEEDS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv07326
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ALDEN LEEDS, INC., ALLIANCE CHEMICAL, INC., ARKEMA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Intervenor: OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION and PASSAIC VALLEY SEWERAGE COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Callahan v. Allan et al
as 3:2023cv01028
Plaintiff: Dylan Callahan
Defendant: Donald Allan, Jr., James M Loree, Lee McChesney and others
Nominal Defendant: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Rammohan v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00369
Plaintiff: Naresh Vissa Rammohan
Defendant: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Donald Allan, Jr., James M Loree and others
Hillsman Modular Molding, Inc. v. Emerson Electric Co et al
as 2:2022cv00043
Plaintiff: Hillsman Modular Molding, Inc.
Defendant: Emerson Electric Co, Glenn Birdwell, Industrial Development Board of White County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
BKK Working Group et al v. Albertsons Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05836
Plaintiff: Rohr, Inc., Univar USA Inc., Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Defendant: Ciba Geigy Corp., Ford Aerospace and Communications Corp., Friction Inc. and others
Petitioner: Barry Wright Controls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Starzynski v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc
as 21-3040
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sabina Starzynski
Defendant / Appellee: Stanley Black & Decker Inc
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant: ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant: NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee: US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party: DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
Montgomery v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc.
as 20-4261
Plaintiff: Donald Wood
Plaintiff / Appellant: William Montgomery, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Donald Wood, Jr., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Stanley Black & Decker Inc, DBA Craftsman

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?