Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dwayne Dawson v. Tim Shoop
as 21-3490
Petitioner / Appellant:
DWAYNE C. DAWSON
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Steve Ennis v. April Dawson, et al
as 21-35258
Defendant / Appellee:
RONA SEIGERT, CORIZON, as Inc., CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE R. ENNIS
Tormu Prall v. Supreme Court, et al
as 19-3183
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, GOVERNOR, GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Not Yet Classified:
STANLEY JUDSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown v. Dawson et al
as 1:2018cv01298
Defendant:
Melvin C. High, Sydney J. Harrison, Angela D. Alsobrooks and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cargyle B. Solomon v. Herman C. Dawson
as 13-2498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARGYLE BROWN SOLOMON
Defendant - Appellee:
HERMAN C. DAWSON, Circuit Court Judge, Upper Marlboro Maryland
Solomon v. Dawson
as 8:2013cv03793
Plaintiff:
Cargyle Brown Solomon
Defendant:
Herman C. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solomon v. Dawson
as 8:2013cv01951
Plaintiff:
Cargyle Brown Solomon
Defendant:
Herman C. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Picard v. Schneiderman
as 13-1785
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Gabriel Capital Corporation, J. Ezra Merkin and others
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Statutory Intervenor pursuant to Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. section 78eee(d)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and the Estate of Bernard L. Madoff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
