Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Simmons v. Ferrigno
as 24-2204
Plaintiff:
SILVON S. SIMMONS
Defendant:
PAUL C. GREENE, SAMUEL GIANCURSIO, CITY OF ROCHESTER and others
USA v. Shay Greene
as 23-3397
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAY C. GREENE
In Re: Fiorillo
as 23-1676
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO
Respondent:
RAYMOND C. GREEN, INC., Trustee and RAYMOND C. GREEN LENDING TRUST
Ocean Development Partners, LLC, et al. v. NE Edge, et al.
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ocean Development Partners, LLC, Ocean Development Partners, LLC, MA, Gotspace Data LLC and others
Defendant:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES, SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In Re: Fiorillo
as 23-1199
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO
Respondent:
RAYMOND C. GREEN, INC., as Trustee of the Raymond C. Green Trust and LOUIS DELPIDIO
Clark Robertson v. Univ of Akron School of Law, et al
as 21-3768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARK A. ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON SCHOOL OF LAW, DEAN CHRISTOPHER J. PETERS, University of Akron School of Law, ASSIST. DEAN CHARLES WAYNE OLDFIELD, University of Akron School of Law and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mario Castro v. Bank of New York Mellon
as 21-1907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO E. CASTRO and MAGDALENA CASTRO
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, CHARLES W. SCHARF, AKERMAN LLP and others
Green v. Lumpkin
as 21-40317
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alfred C. Green
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cheryl Borowski v. Kean University, et al
as 21-1575
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN KUBOW, DAWOOD FARAHI, KEAN UNIVERSITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHERYL BOROWSKI, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
