Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Harris v. The City of New York
as 24-1004
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL C. HARRIS, YUSUF A. HARRIS, GREGORY S. HARRIS and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANDREW DIETZ, New York City Police Department Detective and others
US v. Harris
as 24-1292
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANTHONY C. HARRIS
Interested Party:
HANNAFORD GROCERY STORE
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc. v. Harris
as 2:2023ms00063
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Defendant:
Colleen C Harris
Elliot v. LE GP LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gary Elliot
Defendant:
LE GP, LLC, Kelcy L Warren, Thomas E Long and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris v. McDonough
as 21-2294
Claimant:
CLINTON C. HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
John Hardee v. City of Norfolk
as 21-6997
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK CITY JAIL, JILL C. HARRIS, Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney, OFFICE OF THE NORFOLK COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN T. HARDEE
Lisa Bernal v. Providence Health, et al
as 21-55661
Defendant / Appellee:
JESSICA BENTLEY, BRIAN J. MCNAMARA, KATELYN MICHEL HICKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA M. BERNAL
Robert Foster v. Larry Powell
as 21-6279
Defendant / Appellee:
SPARTANBURG CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, TONY FISHER, Director, J. L. HALL, Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE FOSTER
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Joe Biden
as 21-6012
Defendant / Appellee:
U S SUPREME COURT, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, State Electorial Administrators, Prison & School Systems, STATE OF WISCONSIN, State Electorial Administrators & Prison Authorities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
