Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barbara L. Schramm et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2009cv09442
Plaintiff:
Barbara L. Schramm and Steven L. Weinstein
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Home Finance, LLC, Chase Home Finance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brimlow v. Chase Home Finance, Inc.
as 8:2015cv02680
Plaintiff:
Larry Brimlow
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Bruce Blum v. JP Morgan Chase and Co, et al
as 15-13151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE S. BLUM
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE AND CO, (a Holding company) together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, CHASE MORTAGE CUSTOMER CARE, Chase Home Finance LLC and Chase Home Finance Inc., AURORA COMMERCIAL CORP., Successor organization to Aurora Bank FSB and Aurora Loan Services LLC and others
HANF et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv10216
Plaintiff:
John Hanf and Kathleen Hanf
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. , JPMorgan Chase & Co , Chase Home Finance Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 5211
HANF et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv06072
Plaintiff:
JOHN HANF and KATHLEEN HANF
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., CHASE HOME FINANCE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 5211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
