Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Talley v. Johnson
as 24-2919
Petitioner: MAURICE DANIEL JAMES TALLEY
Respondent: CALVIN JOHNSON
DEITERING v. WORMUTH
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff: DANIEL JAMES DEITERING
Defendant: CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
SILVA v. SWIFT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff: DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant: TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SILVA v. SWIFT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff: DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant: TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT and NASHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SILVA v. SWIFT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff: DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant: TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Daniel Barnes
as 21-10308
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL JAMES BARNES
Silva v. 13 Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00741
Plaintiff: Daniel James Silva
Defendant: 13 Management, Jay Schaudies and Neal and Harwell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1951
Silva v. 13 Management et al
as 3:2021cv00480
Plaintiff: Daniel James Silva
Defendant: Judge William L. Campbell, Jr., Judge Joe Binkley, Judge Eli J. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1951
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01345
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ramsour v. Lumpkin
as 21-40362
Petitioner / Appellant: Daniel James Ramsour
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?