Cases 1 - 10 of 271
Smith v. WWE
as 23-11182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Adrian Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
WWE, Incorporated, Carol Riddick, Frank Riddick and others
In re: David Smith
as 23-12868
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID CURTIS SMITH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03096
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks, State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Florida Cancer Specialist, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates and others
Interested Party:
21st Century Oncology of Jacksonville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Coleman v. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11132
Plaintiff:
Sharan Coleman
Defendant:
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., James C. Foster, David R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Lechter et al v. Aprio, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv01325
Defendant:
Aprio, LLP, James Jowers, Robert Greenberger and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Dalba, Kathryn Dalba, Sylvia Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tusha v. E2Company et al
as 2:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Simon Tusha
Defendant:
E2Company, James Richmond, Jeanne Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc.
as 23-28
Plaintiff:
State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks, District of Columbia ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks
Defendant / Appellee:
Florida Cancer Specialists, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates, Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Montgomery Cancer Center, Oncology Specialties, P.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
