Cases 1 - 7 of 7
REHFELDT v. GREEN ARROW SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
SARAH REHFELDT
Defendant:
GREEN ARROW SOLUTIONS doing business as GREEN ARROW LOANS, INTEGRA FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, NEVADA IMPACT MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hall et al v. Green Arrow Solutions et al
as 1:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hall and Joann McLaughlin
Defendant:
Green Arrow Solutions doing business as Green Arrow Loans, Integra Financial Services, LLC, Nevada Impact Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stewart v. Green Arrow Solutions d/b/a Green Arrow Loans et al
as 4:2022cv40091
Plaintiff:
Richard Stewart
Defendant:
Green Arrow Solutions d/b/a Green Arrow Loans, Integra Financial Services, LLC, Nevada Impact Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: William Ochadleus, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 15-2194
Debtor:
In re: CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Appellant:
WILLIAM OCHADLEUS, SHELTON HAYES, SHIRLEY BERGER and others
Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv02132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HARRIS et al. v. MIRACLE et al.
as 1:2007cv00681
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JOE HARRIS, HARRIS MOBILE APPEARANCE RECONDITIONING SERVICE, INC., TOM JONES and others
Defendant:
MIRACLE APPEARANCE RECONDITIONING SPECIALISTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., MIRACLE APPEARANCE RECONDITIONING SPECIALISTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., INTERNATIONAL SERVICE GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Cintas Corporation v. Burgess et al
as 3:2006cv05146
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Scott Burgess, Doug Choate, Matthew Denise and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
