Cases 1 - 10 of 911
Albizu v. AM PM HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLC
as 1:2024cv22158
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Albizu
Defendant:
AM PM HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. Best (Thomas)
as 24-1453
Defendant:
JEFFREY THOMAS, WALLACE BEST, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Best
as 24-1411
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Ayavaca et al
as 3:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Elvis Gustavo Ayavaca and Latin Escape Bar & Restaurant LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Unauthorized reception of signal
US v. Jairo Aguilera Sagastizado
as 24-4251
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAIRO GUSTAVO AGUILERA SAGASTIZADO, a/k/a Coy, a/k/a Psiclogo
Nuno et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Nuno and Andrea G. Rubio Jimenez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
United States of America v. Best (Cox)
as 24-1188
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. v. WNEK et al
as 2:2024cv05659
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. doing business as INTEGRATED SPORTS MEDIA
Defendant:
STANLEY WNEK, GUSTAVO A. PALACIOS and ESPINDOLA-HERNANDEZ, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. GG's Cocos Locos, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
GG's Cocos Locos, LLC d/b/a Fillmore's and d/b/a Fillmore's Bar & Grill, Claudia E. Lomas and Gustavo A. Lomas, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
