Cases 1 - 10 of 9,117
Wynn v. Harris
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
James Eric Wynn
Defendant:
Annette D. Watkins Harris, Robert E. Hawthorne, Jr. and Luneburg Circuit Court-Clerks Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sandoval et al v. Bosley et al
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sandoval, Samuel Herrera, Arthur Martinez and others
Defendant:
John Bosley, Bosley Management, Inc, Santa Clara Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roundtree v. Lamont
as 24-1319
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess ANJAKNIE ROUNDTREE, -Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglass, ELIZABETH QUEEN, ANDREW, King and others
Defendant:
NED LAMONT, State of Connecticut's Governor, JEN ZAROZI, State Capitol Police, DEVIN, Officer and others
Gwendolyn Hall v. Joe Biden et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
TUCKER v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER
Defendant:
MARK HARRIS, ALETHEA HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cra Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
