Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Irizarry v. DHS
as 24-1872
Petitioner: RICARDO IRIZARRY
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
US v. Diaz-Irizarry
as 24-1497
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: NATANAEL DIAZ-IRIZARRY
USA v. Edwin Irizarry
as 24-1631
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: EDWIN IRIZARRY, a/k/a King Penguin
Irizarry v. Kohls Inc
as 2:2023cv01324
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Irizarry
Defendant: Kohls Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
US v. Irizarry-Irizarry
as 23-1975
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: ARNALDO J. IRIZARRY-IRIZARRY
Interested Party: OFFICE OF THE ELECTION COMPTROLLER
Missouri et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01213
Plaintiff: State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant: Joseph R Biden, Jr, Jennifer Rene Psaki, Vivek H. Murthy and others
Petitioner: Judson Witham, Kimberly D Hogan, Mike Webb and others
Consolidated Defendant: Samaruddin K Stewart, Henry Schwartz and Global Engagement Center
Amicus Curiae: Alliance Defending Freedom, Buckeye Institute and Childrens Health Defense
Consolidated Plaintiff: Connie Sampognaro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as MN/0:23-CV-02818
Plaintiff: Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant: 3M Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00157
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SANTIAGO v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01723
Petitioner: LOURDES IRIZARRY SANTIAGO
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
USA v. Ralph Irizarry
as 22-3251
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RALPH O.R. IRIZARRY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?