Cases 1 - 10 of 33
John Castro v. Donald Trump
as 24-1109
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, SC ELECTIONS COMMISSION, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HOWARD M. KNAPP and SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY
Castro v. Scanlan, et al
as 24-1097
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
DAVID SCANLAN, New Hampshire Secretary of State and DONALD J. TRUMP
Castro v. Toulouse Oliver, et al
as 24-2007
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
MAGGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, DONALD JOHN TRUMP and MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER
John Castro v. Andrew Warner
as 24-1040
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF STATE ANDREW M. WARNER and DONALD J. TRUMP
Intervenor:
WEST VIRGINIA REPUBLICAN PARTY and STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
Castro, et al. v. Fontes, et al.
as 23-3960
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant / Appellee:
ADRIAN FONTES, Secretary of State and DONALD J. TRUMP
Not Yet Classified:
ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY
Castro v. NH Secretary of State et al
as 1:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
NH Secretary of State and Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Castro v. Scanlan, et al
as 23-1902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SCANLAN, New Hampshire Secretary of State, DONALD J. TRUMP and NEW HAMPSHIRE REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae:
JOSEPH L. WESTFALL
In re: John Castro
as 23-2798
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Respondent:
GLENN G. REIS and LAFARO & REISER LLP
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT KIRSCH
Castro v. Secretary of State Gregg Amore et al
as 1:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Secretary of State Gregg Amore and Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Castro v. Copeland-Hanzas et al
as 2:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Sarah Copeland-Hanzas and Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of 5th & 14th Amendements
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
