Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Kelly v. Montgomery County and City Board et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly
Defendant:
Carmen Douglas, Steven L. Reed, Patrick Dunson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Justin Adkins v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 21-2051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN ADKINS, JUSTIN BLAKE, EDWIN GLOWACKI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED, CRAIG S. HELIGMAN, M.D., GUS THOELE and others
Defendant:
CSX CORPORATION and DILLON DOUG JONES
Meyers v. City of New York
as 19-892
Defendant / Appellee:
Vasile Dubovici, Shield # 28892, Michael R. Bloomberg, individually and in his official capacity as former Mayor of the City of New York, Chief of Department Joseph J. Esposito, individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
Officer Does 1-100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Meyers, John Baker, Miles Walsh and others
Quinton Harris, et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 19-1514
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Norman Mount, John Baker, Quinton Harris and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Undetermined:
The National Association of Manufacturers, Association of American Railroads, National Retail Federation and others
Quinton Harris, et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 19-8006
Respondent:
Norman Mount, Scott Zinn, Quinton Harris and others
Petitioner:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Nancy Gucwa, et al v. Jeffrey Lawley, et al
as 17-1823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NANCY GUCWA and MARK MARUSZA
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY LAWLEY, HARVEY G. AGER, W. JOHN BAKER and others
Baker v. Certified Payment Processing, L.P.
as 3:2016cv03002
Plaintiff:
John Baker
Defendant:
Certified Payment Processing, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
