Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Edward Wiggins v. Correctional Officer Johnson
as 19-7632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD L. WIGGINS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Katie Richardson-Patterson, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90026
Plaintiff - Respondent:
KATIE RICHARDSON-PATTERSON, JACQUELINE ROBERTS, E'DREAKA ROSCOE and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
United States of America v. Wiggins
as 4:2011mj30419
Defendant:
Marshan L Wiggins
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Wiggins
as 4:2011mj30419
Defendant:
Marshan L Wiggins
Plaintiff:
United States of America
WIGGINS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00317
Petitioner:
KENNETH L WIGGINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Joseph L. Wiggins, et al. v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83399
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Wiggins
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont
Galapagos, L.L.C. et al v. Vision Bank et al
as 2:2009cv00978
Plaintiff:
Galapagos, L.L.C., Galapagos, L.L.C., Galapagos, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Vision Bank, Bama Bayou LLC, Joe Raley Builders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Reynolds v. Dept/Transportation, et al
as 2:1985cv00665
Plaintiff:
Johnny Reynolds
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Cecil Parker , Robert Johnson , Frank Reed and others
Defendant:
Department of Transportation, State of Alabama , Department of Personnel, State of Alabama , Thomas G. Flowers and others
Pecial_master:
Laurie Edelstein and Carlos Gonzalez
Amicu:
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
Movant:
Robert Camp, John Robbins, Lieutenant Dukes, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
