Cases 1 - 10 of 30
USA v. Mark Green
as 21-3126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK GREEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GUCCIONE v. BANKS et al
as 1:2021cv01910
Plaintiff:
JOYCE E. GUCCIONE
Not Classified By Court:
MADISON CAWTHORN
Defendant:
JIM BANKS, LAUREN BOEBERT, TED BUDD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lu v. Davis, et al
as 21-1306
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH SULLIVAN, DOMINIC BLUE, STEVE POFTAK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Interested Party:
ABM INDUSTRY GROUPS, LLC
USA v. Mark Green
as 21-1756
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK GREEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alcantara v. US
as 21-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRINA HUNTER, HOWELL B. PAYNE, THUNVA TOMMY SIRMSIRIMUKDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Lu v. Stanton, et al
as 20-1843
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH STANTON, WALTER F. TIMILITY, LENA M. WONG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Donald Higgs v. Michael Myers, et al
as 20-2767
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK GREEN, Irvington Police Officer # 311 and MICHAEL MYERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD HIGGS
Defendant:
JUDGE CRONIN, ANGELA GUIDETTA, IN HER PERSONAL & OFFICIAL CAPACITY, FRANK MORALES and others
Spaddy, et al v. MA Appeals Court, et al
as 19-2093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERNETTE MONTGOMERY and RONALD SPADDY
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK GREEN, Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Appeals Court, in his official capacity, MA APPEALS COURT, PHILLIP RAPOZA, in his individual capacity and others
Arkels et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11308
Plaintiff:
Bradley Luckhart, Bobby Bolden, Mason Morris and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
