Cases 1 - 10 of 1,721
Eli Lilly & Company, et al v. Monica Richards
as 24-8017
Petitioner:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Respondent:
MONICA RICHARDS, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals
Wellington, et al. v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, et al.
as 24-3162
Plaintiff:
MONICA WELLINGTON and DAVID WELLINGTON
Defendant:
RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, MARGARET LAKE, MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP and others
Zuniga De Vasquez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3124
Petitioner:
JACQUELINE ELIZABETH ZUNIGA DE VASQUEZ and MONICA LIZETH VASQUEZ ZUNIGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez-Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2907
Petitioner:
MONICA RAMIREZ-RINCON and NICOLAS ALEXIS ORTEGA-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Abboud v. Lotta Dough, LLC
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Monica Abboud
Defendant:
Lotta Dough, LLC d/b/a Hoboken Pie
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sihler et al v. Global E-Trading LLC et al
as 2:2024mc00014
Plaintiff:
Janet Sihler and Charlene Bavencoff
Defendant:
Global E-Trading LLC doing business as Chargebacks911, Gary Cardone and Monica Eaton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Eisen, Inc. v. Mertz et al
as 1:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Eisen, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephanie Mertz and Monica Murthy
Hale et al v. Primary Residential Mortgage Inc
as 4:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Delvin Hale and Monica Hale
Defendant:
Primary Residential Mortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
RATCHFORD et al v. GASELA, INC
as 1:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Alana Marie Souza, andra Cheri moreland, Dessie Pilek and others
Defendant:
GASELA, INC doing business as MI GRAN MARIACHI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
