Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thompson et al v. Albany Port District Commission et al
as 1:2023cv01569
Defendant:
National Grid, Albany Port District Commission, Town of Bethlehem Planning Board and others
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Thompson, Valerian Masao, Kerry McCarey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
US v. Leon Prater
as 24-4013
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LEON PRATER
Meashintubby et al v. Paulk et al
as 6:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Harold Meashintubby and Nellie Meashintubby
Defendant:
Shelly Paulk, Mark Wood and Charles Prater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Tonya Parks
as 23-40039
Petitioner:
In re: Tonya Parks, Bennie Gibson, Francis Gibson and others
Respondent:
AIG, an insurance company based in New York, Timothy Henderson, a removed Oklahoma Judge accused of crimes, David Prater, Oklahoma County District Attorney in his individual and official capacity and others
Advanced Water Well Technologies, LLC v. Prater
as 5:2022cv01270
Plaintiff:
Advanced Water Well Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Jonathan Prater
USA v. Mahlon Prater, Jr.
as 22-5599
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAHLON T. PRATER, JR.
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00761
Plaintiff:
Jones, Matthew Jones, Micheal Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Oklahoma State v. O'Connor, et al
as 21-6156
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN O'CONNOR, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Attorney General and DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Oklahoma County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
