Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rodriguez-Cotto, et al v. Pierluisi-Urrutia, et al
as 23-1626
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SANDRA RODRIGUEZ-COTTO and RAFELLI GONZALEZ-COTTO
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, Governor of Puerto Rico, DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Department of Justice, ALEXIS TORRES, Secretary of Puerto Rico Department of Public Safety and others
Defendant:
INES DEL C. CARRAU-MARTINEZ
Interested Party:
PEN AMERICAN CENTER, INC. and CLINIC FIRST AMENDMENT UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA LAW SCHOOL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rodriguez Tovar v. Garland
as 20-3743
Petitioner:
SANDRA RODRIGUEZ TOVAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 20-1915
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sandra Rodriguez
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Rodriguez-Cotto et al v. Vazquez-Garced et al
as 3:2020cv01235
Defendant:
Denisse Longo-Quinones, Pedro J Janer, Wanda Vazquez-Garced and others
Plaintiff:
Rafelli Gonzalez-Cotto and Sandra Rodriguez-Cotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Sandra Rodriguez
as 20-50006
Defendant / Appellant:
SANDRA RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
H.P.D. Consolidation, Inc. v. Pina et al
as 3:2015cv05309
Plaintiff:
H.P.D. Consolidation, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Pina, Edwin Whitefield, David L Borges and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sandra Rodriguez-De Sanchez v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-60607
Petitioner:
SANDRA RODRIGUEZ-DE SANCHEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
