Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Force MOS Technology Company Limited v. ASUSTeK Computer Incorporated
as 2:2024mc00013
Plaintiff:
Force MOS Technology Company Limited
Defendant:
ASUSTeK Computer Incorporated
Petitioner:
Panjit International Incorporated
Shenzhen Yibo Technology v. FDA
as 24-60191
Petitioner:
Shenzhen Yibo Technology Company, Limited
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration
Shenzhen Youme v. FDA
as 24-60060
Petitioner:
Shenzhen Youme Information Technology Company, Limited
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration
Shenzhen IVPS Tech v. FDA
as 24-60032
Petitioner:
Shenzhen IVPS Technology Company, Limited and ECIGRUSA, L.L.C., doing business as Worldwide Vape Distribution
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration
TikTok, Inc.In re: TikTok, Inc.
as 23-50575
Petitioner:
In re: TikTok, Incorporated, TikTok Pte., Limited, ByteDance, Limited and others
Respondent:
Beijing Meishe Network Technology Company, Limited
AMERICAS DAILY HUSTLER INCORPORATED et al v. COUNTY OF MARION et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
AMERICAS DAILY HUSTLER INCORPORATED and TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES WORTH INVESTMENT RELIANCE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARION, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Secretary of Defense v. Pratt & Whitney
as 23-1337
Appellant:
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Cross Appellant:
PRATT & WHITNEY, a division of Raytheon Technologies Company
Pratt & Whitney v. Secretary of Defense
as 23-1338
Appellant:
PRATT & WHITNEY, a division of Raytheon Technologies Company
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Johnson Controls Technology Company v. Willow Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2022mc80299
Plaintiff:
Johnson Controls Technology Company
Defendant:
Willow Technologies, LLC and Willow Technology Operations Pty Limited
Respondent:
BuildingIQ, Inc.
Groulx v. People's Republic of China et al
as 1:2022cv12295
Plaintiff:
Patrick-Joseph Groulx
Defendant:
People's Republic of China, Bytedance, Toutiao and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
