Cases 111 - 120 of 16,435
LifeVoxel.AI Inc. et al v. Khan et al
as 3:2024cv01339
Defendant:
Adnad Shams, LifeVoxel Virginia SPV, LLC, Amjad M. Khan and others
Plaintiff:
LifeVoxel.AI Inc., Linh Le and Kovey Kovalan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stark v. GG Homes, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01305
Plaintiff:
Collette Stark
Defendant:
Paul Greene and GG Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
PARKER v. THE PHILAELPHIA POLICE CITY CORRUPTION et al
as 2:2024cv03418
Defendant:
LOPEZ - OFFICERS, DETECTIVE WALLACE, MELINDA FIELDS and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA K. PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marlow et al v. Woody et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Defendant:
HOUSTON TRANSPORTATION, INC and A Richard Woody
Plaintiff:
Jerry R. Marlow and Jerry D. Marlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital v. New York State Nurses Association
as 1:2024cv05648
Defendant:
New York State Nurses Association
Plaintiff:
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
