Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Smith v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2014cv03420
Plaintiff:
Jada C. Smith
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Kelly C Smith et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 5:2014cv01654
Defendant:
Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Kelly A Smith and Kelly C Smith
Moore et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2014cv01211
Plaintiff:
Georgina M Moore and Alvin C Smith
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank , James Dimon , Tiffany & Bosco PA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
First Bank and Trust v. Lisa Williams Jones et al
as 2:2014cv01140
Plaintiff:
First Bank and Trust
Defendant:
Lisa Williams Jones , Rudolph C. Smith, Kari Gray-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
First Bank and Trust v. Lisa Williams Jones a/k/a Lisa W Jones Clark et al
as 4:2014cv01353
Plaintiff:
First Bank and Trust
Defendant:
Lisa Williams Jones a/k/a Lisa W Jones Clark , Smith C Smith, Kari Gray Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Smith et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 8:2014cv01143
Plaintiff:
Gary C. Smith and Mary Elaine Smith
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright El v. Carlson et al
as 2:2014cv10281
Plaintiff:
Michael Dynell Wright El
Defendant:
Gene Carlson, Detroit Investor, LLC/Valkyrie Group LLC and Virgil C Smith
Wright-El v. Hagerman et al
as 2:2014cv10280
Plaintiff:
Juan Monroe Wright-El
Defendant:
Stephen A Hagerman, West Side Brick, LLC and Virgil C Smith
M. JEWELL, LLC v. SMITH, JR. et al
as 1:2013cv02055
Defendant:
AEGIS WHOLESALE CORP., AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER, AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
M. JEWELL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Wright v. Hagerman et al
as 2:2013cv15071
Plaintiff:
Juan Monroe Wright
Defendant:
Steve Hagerman, WestSide Brick, LLC and Virgil C Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
