Real Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 313
United States of America v. Estate of Frances R. Tomlinson, Deceased et al
as 4:2021cv04179
Defendant: Cathryn Williams, Estate of Frances R. Tomlinson, Deceased, Craig Tomlinson and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ZIEGENHORN v. OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01800
Plaintiff: ANNE FRANCES ZIEGENHORN
Defendant: OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, OKALOOSA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, STONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOLLNER et al v. COLUMBIA PROPERTY TRUST, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02186
Plaintiff: GEORGE WOLLNER, FRANCES LONG WOLLNER REVOCABLE TRUST, GEORGE W. WOLLNER REVOCABLE TRUST and others
Defendant: COLUMBIA PROPERTY TRUST, INC. and COLUMBIA REIT MARKET SQUARE EAST & WEST, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mcintire-Freeman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust, CO.
as 4:2021cv02424
Plaintiff: FRANCES MCINTIRE-FREEMAN
Defendant: DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2006-NC2, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-NC-2, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff: Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant: Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B P X Properties (N A) L P et al v. Moss & Magnolia L L C et al
as 5:2021cv00289
Defendant: Colbert Lands, LLC, Leslie Hooper Roche, Robert Campbell Hutchinson and others
Plaintiff: BPX Properties (NA) LP, BPX (KCS Resources), LLC, B P X Properties (N A) L P and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
B H P Billiton Petroleum Properties (N A) L P et al v. Hassell Investments L L C et al
as 5:2021cv00292
Defendant: Sandra S. Meaney, Diane Dahlberg Clark, EP Energy E&P Company, L.P. and others
Plaintiff: BHP Billiton Petroleum (KCS Resources) LLC, BHP Billiton Petroleum Properties (N.A.), L.P., B H P Billiton Petroleum Properties (N A) L P and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
B H P Billiton Petroleum Properties (N A) L P et al v. Caspiana Minerals L L C et al
as 5:2021cv00288
Plaintiff: BHP Billiton Petroleum (TXLA Operating) Company, BHP Billiton Petroleum Properties (N.A.), L.P., B P X Properties (N A) L P and others
Defendant: MRC Energy Company, Leslie Hooper Roche, MAP2001-NET and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant: 1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant: 1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?