Cases 51 - 60 of 760
United States of America v. Iiams et al
as 1:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Dustin W. Iiams, First Federal Credit Union, Unknown Parties in Possession and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Edgar Property Investment LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 4:2019cv00316
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff:
Edgar Property Investment LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
BNSF Railway Company v. United Metallurgical Company et al
as 4:2019cv00277
Defendant:
Vyksa Steel Works and United Metallurgical Company
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
Hahn Ready-Mix Company v. Curry's Transportation Service et al
as 3:2019cv00064
Defendant:
Daniel Portillo, Curry's Transportation Service and Curry's Transportation Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hahn Ready-Mix Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Sells et al v. Monsanto Company
as 6:2019cv02057
Plaintiff:
Robert L Sells and Barbara J Sells
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2071
sells et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv00091
Plaintiff:
robert L sells and barbara j sells
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2071
Garloff et al v. Shaffer
as 5:2019cv04040
Plaintiff:
Wanda Garloff and Allan Garloff
Defendant:
Kim A Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc
as 1:2019cv00055
Plaintiff:
Nelson Evans, Jr
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaffer v. Tewes et al
as 5:2019cv04014
Plaintiff:
Kim Shaffer and Kim A Shaffer
Defendant:
Mark Tewes and Bryan Tewes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaffer v. Garloff et al
as 5:2019cv04013
Defendant:
Allan Garloff and Wanda Garloff
Plaintiff:
Kim Shaffer and Kim A Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
