Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Jones et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv02396
Plaintiff:
Annie Jones , Lisa Alfonso , Jeanne Amadon and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jones et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv01943
Plaintiff:
Annie Jones , Lisa Alfonso , Jeanne Amadon and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15339
Plaintiff:
Annie Jones and Derrick Morton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03113
Plaintiff:
Brenda Armstrong , Joby Baker , Latonya Banks and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BLOOMER et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06384
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BLOOMER , MONIQUE CROSBY , ERNEST W. ENGLISH, JR. and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COBB et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05095
Plaintiff:
DONNA F. COBB , GARY COOPER , JAMES FRANK and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2010cv02544
Plaintiff:
Annie Jones
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66697
Plaintiff:
ANNIE JONES
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
