Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Bruhn et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00058
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Bruhn and Rick Reed
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruhn v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28070
Plaintiff:
Robin Bruhn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruhn-Popik v. Kilumbu et al
as 3:2013cv00850
Plaintiff:
Marianne Bruhn-Popik
Defendant:
Kisuka Kilumbu and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Allbritton, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6297
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SARAH RUTH ALLBRITTON, WARREN BELL, EVELYN BROWNLEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Allbritton, et al
as 13-0
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SARAH RUTH ALLBRITTON, WARREN BELL, EVELYN BROWNLEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Allbritton et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00838
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ruth Allbritton , Misty De Groat , Evelyn Brownlee and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Bruhn et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00888
Plaintiff:
Judith Bruhn and James Bruhn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruhn et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00751
Plaintiff:
Judith Bruhn and James Bruhn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRUHN v. PNEUMO ABEX LLC et al
as 2:2009cv70583
Plaintiff:
BARBARA BRUHN
Defendant:
PNEUMO ABEX LLC, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bruhn v. Douglas Mix, et al.
as 1:2009cv00237
Plaintiff:
Johnna Bruhn, Virginia R Rodriguez and Fernando Rodriguez Pintor
Defendant:
Douglas Mix and Central Refrigerated Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
