Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Young v. Friedel et al
as 4:2014cv00499
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vincent Young
Defendant:
Edward J Friedel and DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ewing v. Billingsley et al
as 1:2012cv02901
Plaintiff:
Janice Ewing
Defendant:
Jeffery Billingsley and DHL, Express (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Russell et al v. DHL Express (USA) Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11925
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Russell and Donna Russell
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA) Inc. , DPWN Holdings (USA) Inc., Johnstone Enterprises, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Siegel-Dennis v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11190
Plaintiff:
Connie J. Siegel-Dennis
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc., Anthony E Gaumond, Johnstone Enterprises LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Denault v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv61633
Plaintiff:
Robert Denault and Lisa Denault
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc. and DHL Global Customer Solutions (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Boynton et al v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 1:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Boynton, Kathleen Boynton and Shelly Simpson
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hoover v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 8:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hoover
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. Esports Partners, Inc
as 3:2009xc00942
Amicu:
DHL Express (USA) Inc
Defendant:
Esports Partners, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
DHL Express (USA), Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 25 et al
as 1:2007cv11914
Plaintiff:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 25, Thomas Mari, Sean O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
