Cases 11 - 20 of 8,353
Sooter v. 3M Company
as 1:2024cv02803
Plaintiff:
Gary Sooter
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
DOE v. HOSBACH et al
as 3:2024cv04756
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
GARY HOSBACH, DEBORAH HOSBACH, JOSEPH FIRTH YOUTH CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COPENY v. INDIANAPOLIS POLICE et al
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
GARY COPENY
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS POLICE, FLINT POLICE and JACKSONVILLE POLICE
COPENY v. ENGLAND et al
as 1:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
GARY COPENY
Defendant:
DIANA ENGLAND, MATT EVANS and DIANA WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ABNER, SHANE BOGGS, PATRICK BOWLING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Goldfeder v. Williams,DO et al
as 9:2024cv80407
Plaintiff:
MD Bruce Wayne Goldfeder
Defendant:
Dr Ronald K. Williams,DO, United States, Cory P. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Morse v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv10873
Plaintiff:
Gary Morse
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Elswick v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Gary Elswick
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gardner v. Capital Energy PA LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Gary Gardner
Defendant:
AEP Texas Inc. and Capital Energy PA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Byrd et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Byrd, Derek Junior Adams, Jeffrey O'Brien Anglim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
