Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Smith v. Evans et al
as 4:2019cv00540
Defendant:
John Kelser Evans, Randall Shane Reust and Jeffery Lynn Anderson
Plaintiff:
George Smith and George Wright Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2019cv12709
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Daugherty Johnson, Gerald Ambrose and others
Plaintiff:
Randell Kelley, Denise Cooper Sawyers, Rebecca Deacons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03132
Plaintiff:
John S Evans
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Evans et al
as 2:2019cv02009
Plaintiff:
Marilyn T Brown and Jestin M Covington
Defendant:
John J Evans and Ruan Logistics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. AT & T, Corp. et al
as 5:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
John C. Evans and Debra G. Evans
Defendant:
AT & T, Corp. , AT & T, Inc., Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01161
Plaintiff:
John P. Evans
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv23957
Plaintiff:
John P. Evans
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. General Electric Company et al
as 4:2011cv00802
Plaintiff:
John J Evans
Defendant:
General Electric Company and Daewoo Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Evans v. WMATA
as 11-7138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Antonio Evans
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
EVANS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv30469
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. EVANS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
