Cases 11 - 20 of 31
McCoy v. Carlson et al
as 3:2017cv00432
Plaintiff:
Gary L McCoy
Defendant:
Rodney Carlson, David Conley and John/Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. G.K. Pope Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01257
Plaintiff:
Duane C. Goodwin
Defendant:
G.K. Pope Trucking, Inc. and Guster L. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 4:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Adams , David J. Amons , Freddie Bolton, Jr. and others
Defendant:
John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , John M. O'Quinn & Associates L.L.P. , John M. O'Quinn, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01984
Plaintiff:
Georgette Petrina McCoy and Jimmie L. McCoy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01100
Plaintiff:
Patricia L McCoy
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy et al v. Manning Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
David A. McCoy and Regena L. McCoy
Defendant:
Fritz Kingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy et al v. Comfort Systems
as 6:2015cv01034
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. McCoy and Nikki L. McCoy
Defendant:
Comfort Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01111
Plaintiff:
Barbara L. McCoy
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv23791
Plaintiff:
Barbara L. McCoy
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv12541
Plaintiff:
Betty L. McCoy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
